Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.